▲ Work in progress. This site is built and researched in the open: pages, numbers and findings may change or be wrong, and the record has gaps. Not advice. More

The Lab

Ideas traders use, put to the record

← the Lab · signals tested · write-up

#28 Does the S&P 500's RSI warn of Bitcoin's falls? No reliable edge

Past prices only. Every figure is a price change, an RSI reading, a share or a count.
Last checked: 16 October 2026.

The claim

A recent video (The Trading Parrot, "The S&P 500 Chart That Could Change Bitcoin Forever", 14 October 2026) says:

  1. The S&P 500's monthly RSI peaks line up with Bitcoin's cycle tops, and its lows with Bitcoin's bear-market bottoms, "in perfect harmony" since Bitcoin began.
  2. The S&P's monthly RSI reached "almost 88" in Bitcoin's lifetime, and bottomed "at 62" in 2022.
  3. The gold-to-copper ratio runs in cycles of about 1,000 days.

We also asked a question of our own: when the S&P's RSI "rolls over", does Bitcoin fall?

The video's forecast, a top in 2027–28, can't be tested.

How we tested

The maths, step by step

1. The RSI. Average the recent rises and the recent falls, each smoothed so the latest move counts 1/14.

2. When a turn is known. A peak is only a peak once the RSI has fallen 15 points from it. If it peaks at 88 in January and falls to 73 in March, the January peak was known in March. Any warning can only start then.

3. The lag. For each Bitcoin turn, find the nearest RSI turn of the same kind and count the months between them. Average the gaps, ignoring which came first.

What we found

1. The video's numbers.

2. The two do turn together, looking back.

3. But it doesn't warn in time.

4. After a roll-over.

roll-overBitcoin over the next 12 monthsworst fall in that year
August 2013+273%−19%
January 2015+69%−2%
March 2018−41%−54%
October 2018+45%−49%
September 2021−56%−58%
December 2024−6%−18%

5. The three big falls, one by one.

6. Before Bitcoin (for context only).

7. Gold and copper. The ratio's lows came 2,069, 395, 305, 700, 306, 1,369, 1,157 and 1,216 days apart. Only the last three are near 1,000. The gaps vary more than they would for a random series with the same moves, so the 1,000-day cycle is seen by eye, not in the data.

What it means

Limits

Update, 16 October 2026: two corrections

Added after this page was published. The text above is left as it was.

Update, 27 October 2026: where the idea comes from

Added after this page was published. The text above is left as it was.

Credits

← Fibonacci confluenceDo coins have a clock? →

Educational research from public market data; any trading discussed is paper, never real. Nothing here is advice. The full notice.