▲ Work in progress. This site is built and researched in the open: pages, numbers and findings may change or be wrong, and the record has gaps. Not advice. More

The Lab

Ideas traders use, put to the record

← the Lab · strategies tested · write-up

#47 Buying steadily, or all at once? No reliable edge

Past prices; no real orders were placed. Every figure is a share of the money, or a count.
Last checked: 16 October 2026.

Where the idea comes from

The question

After our tests of trading plans, a reader asked: is the only reliable edge to buy steadily and hold, with no leverage?

Buying a fixed amount on a schedule is called DCA (dollar-cost averaging). The practice is old. Benjamin Graham described it for ordinary investors in 1949, and George Constantinides showed in 1979 that, in theory, it can't be the best policy. We asked three things:

  1. Does DCA end with more than putting all the money in on day one?
  2. Or does it only make the ride less painful?
  3. Is that calmer ride anything more than keeping some money out of the market?

How we tested

The maths, step by step

1. Why DCA wins when the price falls. Put in 1,000. The price is 100 on day one and 50 on day two (no fees, to keep it simple).

DCA and half now end the same. DCA's edge here is the cash it hadn't spent yet when the price fell.

2. Why it loses when the price rises. The price is 100, then 200.

3. The "averaging" in the name. Buying the same amount each time buys more coins when the price is low. So DCA's average buying price is never above the average price over the period. But all-at-once bought everything at the first price, and in a rising market that's lower still.

What we found

1. On Bitcoin, Ether and Solana, all at once usually ended higher.

LengthDCAAll at once
1 year1.231.40
2 years1.612.03
4 years2.193.41

2. DCA did make the ride calmer.

3. But that calm is the cash it holds back.

4. Who wins depends on what the price did. Bitcoin, weekly DCA over 1 year, share of starts where it beat all at once:

Start yearDCA ahead
201887%
20200%
202171%
20230%
20242%
202569%

DCA wins when the price falls during the buying. All at once wins when it rises.

5. The coins picked at the time.

What it means

Limits

Update, 18 October 2026: two charts

Finding 4 as pictures. First, for weekly DCA over a year, the share of each year's starts where it ended ahead of buying all at once, on all three coins. Then two Bitcoin years drawn out, one that went each way.

How often buying weekly for a year beat buying all at once, by start year
↑ % of starts where DCA ended ahead
0204060802017Bitcoin, 2017: 31.58Ether, 2017: 26.322018Bitcoin, 2018: 86.79Ether, 2018: 86.792019Bitcoin, 2019: 34.62Ether, 2019: 32.692020Bitcoin, 2020: 0Ether, 2020: 0Solana, 2020: 52021Bitcoin, 2021: 71.15Ether, 2021: 48.08Solana, 2021: 34.622022Bitcoin, 2022: 53.85Ether, 2022: 57.69Solana, 2022: 86.542023Bitcoin, 2023: 0Ether, 2023: 1.92Solana, 2023: 02024Bitcoin, 2024: 1.89Ether, 2024: 64.15Solana, 2024: 33.962025Bitcoin, 2025: 69.23Ether, 2025: 46.15Solana, 2025: 82.05
the year the buying started →
— Bitcoin— Ether— Solana

The winner changes with the year: DCA when the price fell during the buying (2018), all at once when it rose (2020, 2023).

Two years of Bitcoin, bought weekly or all at once
↑ the pot, as a multiple of the money
01201002003002018, weekly DCA2018, all at once2023, weekly DCA2023, all at once
days since the start →
— 2018, weekly DCA- - 2018, all at once— 2023, weekly DCA- - 2023, all at once

In 2018 the price fell and the weekly buyer lost less (46% against 72%), while in 2023 it rose and buying all at once ended far ahead.

Credits

← More Bitcoin, without adding moneyCoin-flip traders →

Educational research from public market data; any trading discussed is paper, never real. Nothing here is advice. The full notice.